Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

Diese Projektseite in anderen Sprachen:

Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien

Nominierung

Leitsätze für die Nominierung

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.

Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.

Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.

Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.

Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.

Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.

Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.

Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
- nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
- Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
- schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.

Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.

Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.

Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.

Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.

Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.

Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.

Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.

Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.

Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.

Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.

Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.

Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.

Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

{{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
{{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
{{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
{{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
{{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
{{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

{{Keep}} Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
{{Delist}} Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:

In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten

Allgemeine Regeln

Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw}} ~~~~.
Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch

Zum Bearbeiten der Liste mit den Nominierungen klicke auf: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
Eine chronologische Liste ist unter Commons:Featured pictures/chronological zu finden.
Ein Archiv vergangener Nominierungen liegt unter Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.
Eine Anleitung, wie man Nominierungen beendet, findet sich unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Inhaltsübersicht

Exzellenz-Kandidaten

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Bill Thompson (Tasmanian convict) grey.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 01:28:22

Info First of all, it's a black and white mangling of a sepia original, second, the sepia version says it's cropped from the original, and I don't know if it could be cropped better - the failure to get it at the time has meant link rot has lost us the chance - but it's a pretty bad crop. Absolutely no foot room. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rheinsberg Schloss und Park asv2024-03 img04.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:42:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info The lake side of the Rheinsberg Palace. All by me --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely reflections and lovely architecture Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schönbach Kirche Innenraum 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:39:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Interior with the three winged altars of the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good evocation of a modest but lovely church Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac d'Espingo (6).jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scenic and loads of details to explore at sharp full resolution Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gallusovo nabrezje in Ljubljana (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! You somehow have given it the look of an ink drawing with watercolor rendering. --Cart (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is pretty great - unusual but effective composition, excellent light Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. Looking at it reminds me a little of Canaletto's paintings. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 05:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on an overgrown heathland in mild evening light.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masonic Temple in Orland, California-L1001527.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 02:59:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A well balanced composition that highlights the striking blue windows as a focal point. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bland building, but the 'Hopper-ish' composition makes it work. --Cart (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart. Painterly. A study in cream and blue colours. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traditional Kinnauri house, Sangla, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 19:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice architecture but the harsh midday light doesn't help to distinguish the roof and the ground floor -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review, I've tried to soften the light and reduce the shadows a little. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know what Basile Morin means, the house is a little bit dark under the harsh light and blends into the background. Nevertheless I love it. Great choice to go for a square composition to focus on the house. It's a really interesting subject and I love how the angular and jagged roof looks like one of the mountain peaks. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kingfisher with a catch.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 17:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info created & uploaded by Dipu ME-12 – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good moment but not sharp enough IMO. Sorry--Ermell (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry but per Ermell, not really focussed properly and only 6 megapixels, hence not FP for me despite excellent moment and good composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow-footed Green Pigeon হলদে-পা হরিয়াল.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 10:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
Info created & uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FP Gallery can be specify with Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves). ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry but in my opinion oversharpened which I struggle to overlook at this relatively low resolution Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support though quality can be better I still like the subject. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common grackle in PP (36732).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 00:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Icteridae_(Icterids)
Info Common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), a kind of blackbird. I like that this shot captures some of its feathers' iridescence. Fun fact: a group of grackle sis called a "plague". :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful bird and great compo with the helpful twig matching the shapes of the bird. --Cart (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little tern (Sternula albifrons) male, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Laridae (Gulls, terns and skimmers)
Info created by Princepauljoy – uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a bit noisy but still a spectacular capture Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, too noisy and oversharpened for my taste. The scene itself though is fantastic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Imho, the bokeh doesn't look entirely natural. Nevertheless, the scenery is magnificent, a fortunate moment to have captured in a photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalkkoora Bhagavathi Theyyam At Kunjimangalam (34).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 17:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala, an Indian State. In this photo documented live performance of a Theyyam.
All by --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, per the rules, could you write a good description in the |description = box on the file page. This is so that people searching for photos can find it easier, and so all of us living outside Kerala can have a better understanding about what the photo depicts. Like who is the dancer supposed to be, are there any specific meanings for the colors and different items on the costume, are the dancers men or female, when and for how long is the dance/celebration. We foreigners would love to hear about such things. ;) Thank you. --Cart (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Shagil Kannur (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you. Striking image and interesting description. Information about an image always makes it more valuable. --Cart (talk) 09:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive pose, striking and colorful composition. Thank you very much for the detailed description. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please Ranjithsiji and Shagil Kannur, you should never rename and move a file during a FPC nomination, unless you know exactly what you are doing. The move broke all the links necessary for the FPC system to work. I have now cleaned up that mess for you and everything is fine, but in the future fix re-naming before or after the nomination, never during. Thank you. --Cart (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Cart. I apologise for the problems caused by me. I used the mass rename script to rename all the files because the main subject of the file was different. It is an intolerable factual error in the case of file name. But I did not noticed this exact FPC. Sorry for the problems. I will be careful in future and thank you for your quick help. Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I’ll be more careful next time. The names were incorrectly given for the 157 photos I uploaded. With Ranjithsiji’s help, all the misnamed files have been corrected, including this one. Once again, I apologize for the mistake.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Please just ask some experienced FPC-user for help or give some warning if you need to move any files here at FPC. We can always make things work, we just need to know so we can keep your nominations safe. --Cart (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-6-78-181-31 Kerlachkapelle Stadtlauringen.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 12:37:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Motif, sharpness, resolution, colors and light are convincing. --Milseburg (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Milseburg. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Cmao20--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)~~[reply]

Not sure what you meant to say here Shagil Kannur, was this intended to be a vote? Cmao20 (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mobile editing error. Sorry for this time. Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Milseburg. – Aristeas (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plain vanilla muffin in Tuntorp.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 11:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Bread
Info Plain vanilla muffin, newly baked and photographed on crumpled baking paper. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, golden brown, fragrant - you can almost smell the vanilla. A feast for the eyes, but sadly not for my taste buds! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're ever in the neighborhood, I'll make you some. :) I'm so very glad you are well enough to participate here again! You've been missed. --Cart (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that sounds amazing! Thank you so much! I'm doing my best - pain is a stubborn companion, but good company (and the thought of vanilla muffins) helps :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Pleasant and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 12:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appetizing and atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This looks delicious, but I don't like the background paper. Yann (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When you bake muffins like this, there is always a risk that one or some of them will tip a bit and spill onto the sheet pan. To prevent the messy burning and the following cleaning, a baking paper is often used to cover the pan. It can be re-used between the batches even if it's wrinkled and slightly burned. I liked the texture of it, so I included it. More interesting than a plain flat surface to me, but that's a matter of taste. --Cart (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support There is like a yellow cast in my view, and I think the light could have been better with limited shadow in the foreground. I also share Yann's view on the paper background. However, the composition is fine and it's an appetizing FPC of food -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Bad background. And what is special for this image?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galappel (Cynips quercusfolii) 25-12-2024. (d.j.b).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 05:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info oak-apple still attached to an oak leaf, sunk in a carpet of leaves under tall trees. Focus stack of 33 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Famberhorst: , please, check the contour of the little water layer below the fungus. There is a cloning effect on its right-hand side end. --Harlock81 (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Harlock81: If I understand the place correctly, the error has been corrected. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was there.

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cart (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting photo subject. Thanks for the retouching! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another good focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imsouane beach Morocco 6.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 02:03:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I quite like the choice to have a vertical composition here, it's brave and helps highlight the layers in the waves and the rocks. But personally I can't see enough outstanding in terms of motif, light (which is quite harsh) or quality to make this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It lacks wow in my view, and I don't like the composition with tight crop bottom and top. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carl Nebel - Genl. Scott's entrance into Mexico, Plate 45.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 01:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Adolphe Jean-Baptiste Bayot after Carl Nebel, restored, uploaded, ans nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view of the Zócalo with the Cathedral. – Aristeas (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roofed section of Fredsgatan in Gothenburg.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 11:24:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info The roofed section with shop signs of Fredsgatan, a prestigious shopping street in Gothenburg, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry for the perspective at first sight. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Perspective is intentional for a dynamic impression. It is corrected based on the opening at the end of the arcade, which is horisontal and straight. Not all architecture photos need to follow the "FP church aisle perspective". --Cart (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I agree with Moheen. It's directly visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's visible when it's intentional. If you don't like it, that's fine, but it's not something that accidentally happened to the photo or something I forgot to fix. The whole idea here is to play with the strong lines in the scene, treating it as something almost abstract. --Cart (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a matter of taste. For me the dynamic impression is successful.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It works also for me. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~I wold clean CA, anoted. Picture is not so bad.~~ --Mile (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed Thanks for the tip! Talk about having a blind spot in your own photo. :) --Cart (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The architectural arrangement and perspective lends a pleasing depth and draws the eye into the distance. In addition, the interplay of light and shadow adds dynamism to the scene and, for me personally, a sense of clarity and structure. The mentioned CA's are not prominently visible, but can be removed (especially on the Junkyard clothing store logo). -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Let's see. Good aperture, quality fine, and something different. One out of "normal". --Mile (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light is well handled but the content with commercial signs is uninteresting in my subjective view, sorry (no wow) and I don't like the angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not quite per Basile: I like the angle of view and the subtle perspective correction, but I'm not a fan of the HDR look (lifted shadows, toned-down highlights, punchy colours). Difficult shot and interesting nomination, nonetheless -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Sebastián de La Gomera 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 08:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice and appealing composition but not quite the quality you'd expect from a panorama. The structures and rocks work but the greenery looks very "Minecraft-y". --Cart (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the green looks something like this in January.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, too low-quality. The detail is lost at high magnification. JayCubby (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support weakish because the details at full size are not that good but I love the colours and the panoramic composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Beautiful colours and arrangement, but the light is a bit unfortunate, making the buildings look rather flat and overexposed, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:American woodcock (95252).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 02:34:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Scolopacidae_(Typical_Waders)
Info American woodcock (Scolopax minor), a plump, goofy shorebird of the forest floor that dances back and forth to search for worms in the ground. Typically very skittish and often challenging to find, for some reason they really like this one urban park in Manhattan, with a couple turning up each year. Makes it one of the few places where you can actually get a reasonably close shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent capture. The birds were on that land long before NY was built, glad to hear that some are not giving up their claim. ;-) --Cart (talk) 10:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good picture of a bird in its environment Cmao20 (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imsouane beach Morocco 5.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 02:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and calm enough, but the foreground looks a bit overexposed and even a minimalistic beach FP needs some element that captures your attention and makes it stand out among all other beaches, but I can't see that here. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 10:51, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The overexposed foreground is for me the main problem of the picture, sorry. --Harlock81 ( talk) 19:30, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Harlock81 -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cocodrilo del Nilo (Crocodylus niloticus), reserva natural Masái Mara, Kenia, 2024-05-20, DD 70.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 20:57:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Crocodylidae (Crocodiles)
Info Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus), Masai Mara, Kenya. This species is widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa and generally, the adult male Nile crocodile is between 3.5 and 5 m (11 ft 6 in and 16 ft 5 in) in length and weighs 225 to 750 kg (496 to 1,653 lb). Nile crocodiles are very aggressive and opportunistic apex predators, that are capable of taking almost any animal within their range. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one looks very smug about being an apex predator. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support To me he looks terrifying.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Were you close, or did you use "just" a good photographic objective? Of course, I'm joking. I agree with Famberhorst about the frightening look of the crocodile, albeit asleep. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:49, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge wow and superb quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cart. (The comparison with the smile of some contemporary political predators is left as an exercise to the reader.) – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, eye-catching close-up and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traditional fishing festival 46.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 21:54:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Azimronnie – uploaded by Azimronnie – nominated by Myrealnamm -- Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first glance, I didn't understand that they are walking in the water. Interesting subject. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:44, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, nice find, thank you for the nomination! – Aristeas (talk) 19:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning! And nobody seems to be looking up at the drone, lending additional candour to the shot. -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Liberté guidant le peuple - Eugène Delacroix - Musée du Louvre Peintures RF 129 - après restauration 2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 20:23:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Groups
Info created by Eugène Delacroix / Louvre Museum, uploaded by Shonagon nominated by Yann
Info Liberty Leading the People is one of the most famous French painting. It has influenced many people, including Victor Hugo and Bartholdi for the Statue of Liberty. It has also always been controversial, partly due to the representation of bare-breasted woman, and partly due to violence atmosphere of the scene.
Support Very high resolution, reproduction after a recent restoration. The difference with earlier copies is amazing. -- Yann (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. Always feels odd to see an artwork you're so used to seeing, after a restoration. --Cart (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Through the depiction of idealism and realism, we are reminded of how far we should not go to realize ideals. Iconic masterpiece, excellent restoration. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Msb (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart and Radomianin. At the first glance the restored colours are surprising, but they make sense: seems that Delacroix wanted the entire painting to be dominated by the French national colors. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:28, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puran Dhaka Ifter Bazar 53.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 19:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info created by A S M Jobaer – uploaded by A S M Jobaer – nominated by A S M Jobaer -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please make sure that the gallery links work and goes to the right place, when you create a nomination. I have fixed this for you now, but you need to do that in the future. --Cart (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am new here and I really don't know how to edit these kind of posts. If you help me I will edit more carefully and better than before A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You edit by clicking on the "edit" at the top of the nomination page and then follow the instruction that appear in the editing window. You can also read how to make these the correct way on the COM:FPC page. It has rules and instructions. Good luck now! --Cart (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Delicious fruit but awkward composition in my view. Out of focus ginger and distracting corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good-looking berries, but the whole composition is too messy for me. --Cart (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the messy background with all the berry smears. The motif has potential but the image in general is not FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:First 3 digits of Japanese postal code.png

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 17:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Asia
Info created by はにしな – uploaded by はにしな – nominated by Halowand -- Halowand (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Halowand (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Kerf.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:17:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Beach crossing De Kerf in the Schoorl dunes. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing landscape, but the image is too blurry, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks sharp to me, and don't forget it's 36 megapixels Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Yes, it could use a bit more sharpness and contrast, but it's also extremely beautiful. As lovely as beach dunes are, they are also tricky to work into a good compo, so well done for this. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and mood. In places like these dunes it’s often difficult to find a typical view which condenses the essence of the landscape in a single image; here this has been achieved. – Aristeas (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth (5) WLB.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop is too large, in my opinion. The high level of blur of the foreground is distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but not sufficient depth of field for me and the large amount of blurry foreground is distracting, good butterfly pic nevertheless but a little short of some recent ones we've seen at FPC Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colors of Bishwa Ijtema.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:19:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Rusho127 – uploaded by Rusho127 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice capture. --Mile (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition--Anitava Roy (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:22, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive uniformity and a stunning array of colors. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:48, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Tanvir Rahat (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tolles Foto. Die gleichmäßigen Formen, die Symmetrie und die verschiedenen Farben entzücken das Auge --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty neat, wouldn't be surprised to see this do well at POTY Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support An extra ordinary, stunning image. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Awesome patchwork and pixelation effect. Great to look at full size. Also per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the best drone images I've seen! -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 11:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Palma - Caldera de Taburiente Interior - 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unexceptional mountain image, in my view. Harsh shadows, hazy background and dull light. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The landscape is awesome, but perhaps the photo would benefit from a little more light and a square crop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.carter (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --imehling (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thanks! For me this brings out the layers in the scene better and the trees sits more balanced in the composition. --Cart (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Dramatic and satisfying composition for me despite edge sharpness being only OK Cmao20 (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the new version.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive landscape in my eyes – with the distinctive trees on the steep rock and the rising clouds it reminds me of Chinese landscape paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handcrafted.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Mahinur11 – uploaded by Mahinur11 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak support~~ Editing quality could be better, but it's striking, unusual motif that makes you happy to view. I also like that your nominations have good descriptions and categories, that makes it easier for users who are searching for specific photos to find these. --Cart (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is oversaturated (see the woman's face). I would support with less saturation. Yann (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are right. Any chance of fixing this Kaim Amin? --Cart (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I noticed the oversaturation too. I'll try to upload a fixed image. Kaim (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until it is fixed. Yann (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Somehow. Crop could be better, to put her head on up-left third, or , to remove sand border on both sides - crop or strecth size. --Mile (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC) p.S. Here, i would try this option too. @Kaim Amin[reply]
Weak support Per Cart --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in its current form. Mile's crop is definitely superior, and the saturation as pointed by Yann has also not been fixed. A renaming is also required for a more descriptive title. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Too many issues as such, would support if all fixes are implemented. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting but could be improved, per above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version (Saturation edited, cropped)

Support, As suggested above, I edited it a bit and cropped on either side. pinging Basile Morin, Ermell, JukoFF, MZaplotnik, PetarM, Shagil Kannur, UnpetitproleX, W.carter, Yann -- Kaim (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, this is better. I've striked my vote above and moved it down here. For some reason I didn't get any 'ping' (I just came to have a look anyway) so let's hope it worked for the rest of the voters. Sometimes group pings to more than 5 users doesn't work here on Commons. If the others don't show up, you might have to make some new 'pings'. --Cart (talk) 23:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indrakeeladri and Prakasam Barrage from Tadepalli (02).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2025 at 13:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info No FPs of this place. Just great light and satisfying composition. created by I.Mahesh – uploaded by I.Mahesh – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's really great that you keep finding photos from new places and new photographers, but in doing so, would you please see to it that the photos are accompanied with good descriptions and categorizations. This nomination is to the 'Boats' gallery without any mention of the boats on the file page. Please remember that (per the rules) documentation is just as important for an FP as the photo. I'm asking you kindly. --Cart (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I.Mahesh for fixing this! :-) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I do generally do this, but yes, sure, you’re right Cmao20 (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice distribution of the various objects in the photo for me. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:S.M. Küstenpanzerschiff Ägir - restoration.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2025 at 11:57:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Marine
Info created by Hugo Graf, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Olivier LPB (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support and thank you. Don't know why I didn't nominate this at the time, but I used to be a lot less organised about what had and hadn't been nominated on Commons, and the two nomination limit sometimes meant I'd forget about things. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheremoszky Preserve RB.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 19:02:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I would expect more details and more sharpness. The composition is quite good, very good. --XRay 💬 11:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice view, maybe could do with a little more space on the left hand side to complete the curve of the shoreline Cmao20 (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, although the sunlight coming from behind the camera lights up the right side nicely. Tsays22 (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm a little bit bothered by the magenta cast in the photo, it's not much but looking at the clouds it's there. --Cart (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Absalom Baird, probably by the Webster Brothers.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2025 at 14:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
Info probably created by the Webster Brothers – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:33, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1860-1869

Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)

Tue 25 Mar → Sun 30 Mar
Wed 26 Mar → Mon 31 Mar
Thu 27 Mar → Tue 01 Apr
Fri 28 Mar → Wed 02 Apr
Sat 29 Mar → Thu 03 Apr
Sun 30 Mar → Fri 04 Apr

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)

Thu 20 Mar → Sun 30 Mar
Fri 21 Mar → Mon 31 Mar
Sat 22 Mar → Tue 01 Apr
Sun 23 Mar → Wed 02 Apr
Mon 24 Mar → Thu 03 Apr
Tue 25 Mar → Fri 04 Apr
Wed 26 Mar → Sat 05 Apr
Thu 27 Mar → Sun 06 Apr
Fri 28 Mar → Mon 07 Apr
Sat 29 Mar → Tue 08 Apr
Sun 30 Mar → Wed 09 Apr